I'm not stupid enough to believe that there was no form of communication to Texas for two and a half years. I'm not stupid enough to celebrate a "holiday" just because slaves rejoiced in being freed. We should be fighting for legal restitution. If one white person were falsely imprisoned and then freed but no one told them about it for TWO AND A HALF YEARS, there would be a lawsuit the size of Texas on his behalf. Hell, he would own half of Texas after he got finished suing. Yes, I'm sure he would rejoice when he was freed but turning it into a holiday? Hell no. Rather than point out the injustice, we want to make it a national holiday. The insanity of it all is what confuses me.
I've spoken to Black people from Texas, who are the people who seem to celebrate it the most, and they insist that they celebrate it because that's what they were taught. Isn't this the same thing I hear every Thanksgiving when I bring up the fact that celebrating Thanksgiving is really celebrating the holocaust of 15 million Natives? Where's the common sense? The movement should be for reparations for every second of every day that Black people were enslaved past Jan 1st, 1963. The US government should be held accountable for its illegal actions. Texas landholders should be held accountable. The monies should go to education, housing, small business loans, and health care for Black Texans.
Can you imagine Jews celebrating the fact that people were left in concentration camps for two and a half years after they were freed? Can you imagine white people trying to deny Jews legal justice for anyone who was in that situation? Not only do we not want to hold the people who were responsible accountable, we want to have a party on top of it. It's so sinful it's a shame.
3 comments:
Thank-you for putting this out there. I never really knew what Juneteenth was about. I had heard various things but I didn't really know the heart of the matter. As for the Emancipation Procolomation, that's a whole nother story. I have some pretty strong views on it because it did not do necessarily what history says it did. Anyhoo, I just wanted to say thanks for enabling me to learn something new today.
Damn straight! (I always wondered about this, but thought maybe I was just missing the point somehow. I would totally support this movement for reparations.)
More vaguely related interesting knowledge: slaves in the slave states that did not secede were held in bondage until the 13th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was passed because the Emancipation Proclamation only applied to those in the seceded South. The states that got to keep their slaves for an additional two years legally were Deleware, Kentucky, Missouri, Maryland, and West Virginia.
Lincoln even told the Vice President of the Confederacy that the Proclamation was just a function of the war (primarily that the North couldn't win without Black soldiers). He assured his Confederate brother that, after it was all over, things would go back to business as ususal, which, of course, didn't happen, but could have been the intention (at least Lincoln said it was).
One Kentucky slave-holder suddenly divested of his "property" by the 13th Amendment has been quoted as saying, "If I'd known they were going to free the slaves, I'd have fought for the Confederacy!" In point of fact, Kentucky didn't even ratify the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments until 1976...!
I don't think you get it -- and I know you knew someone would counter your arguments. Whether it was two years or 15, that they were FREE meant more than anything.
We haven't been subjugated like they were. Maybe we cannot identify with the joy they must have felt.
However, you do have very serious points and I would love for someone to find out the mysterious tale of why these B/black people didn't know they were even free for two years and whether it IS actionable as a human rights offense.
Post a Comment